Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jun 10, 2009
  2. Jun 09, 2009
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      rpc: Add a simple failure reporting framework · 2cc6781a
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      This patch adds a simple failure reporting tool, similar to bdev's
      _ThrowError. In backend, we move towards the new-style RPC results (of
      type (status, payload)) and thus functions which use this style can very
      easily log and return the error message using this new function.
      
      The exception is declared here and not in errors.py since it's local to
      the node-daemon/backend combination.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarGuido Trotter <ultrotter@google.com>
      2cc6781a
  3. Jun 08, 2009
  4. Jun 04, 2009
  5. May 28, 2009
  6. May 27, 2009
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      Add a node powercycle command · f5118ade
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      This (somewhat big) patch adds support for remotely rebooting the nodes
      via whatever support the hypervisor has for such a concept.
      
      For KVM/fake (and containers in the future) this just uses sysrq plus a
      ‘reboot’ call if the sysrq method failed. For Xen, it first tries the
      above, and then Xen-hypervisor reboot (we first try sysrq since that
      just requires opening a file handle, whereas xen reboot means launching
      an external utility).
      
      The user interface is:
      
          # gnt-node powercycle node5
          Are you sure you want to hard powercycle node node5?
          y/[n]/?: y
          Reboot scheduled in 5 seconds
      
      The node reboots hopefully after sending the reply. In case the clock is
      broken, “time.sleep(5)” might take ages (but then I suspect SSL
      negotiation wouldn't work).
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarGuido Trotter <ultrotter@google.com>
      f5118ade
  7. May 26, 2009
  8. May 22, 2009
  9. May 21, 2009
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      Add a luxi call for multi-job submit · 2971c913
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      As a workaround for the job submit timeouts that we have, this patch
      adds a new luxi call for multi-job submit; the advantage is that all the
      jobs are added in the queue and only after the workers can start
      processing them.
      
      This is definitely faster than per-job submit, where the submission of
      new jobs competes with the workers processing jobs.
      
      On a pure no-op OpDelay opcode (not on master, not on nodes), we have:
        - 100 jobs:
          - individual: submit time ~21s, processing time ~21s
          - multiple:   submit time 7-9s, processing time ~22s
        - 250 jobs:
          - individual: submit time ~56s, processing time ~57s
                        run 2:      ~54s                  ~55s
          - multiple:   submit time ~20s, processing time ~51s
                        run 2:      ~17s                  ~52s
      
      which shows that we indeed gain on the client side, and maybe even on
      the total processing time for a high number of jobs. For just 10 or so I
      expect the difference to be just noise.
      
      This will probably require increasing the timeout a little when
      submitting too many jobs - 250 jobs at ~20 seconds is close to the
      current rw timeout of 60s.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarGuido Trotter <ultrotter@google.com>
      2971c913
Loading