Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Nov 22, 2010
  2. Nov 19, 2010
  3. Nov 18, 2010
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      Reinstall instance: disallow offline secondaries · 9aacb199
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      Currently, reinstallation of a DRBD instance with the secondary node offline does:
      
      node1# gnt-instance reinstall -f instance1
      Waiting for job 139053 for instance1...
      Thu Nov 18 01:36:09 2010  - WARNING: Could not prepare block device disk/0 on node node3 (is_primary=False, pass=1): Node is marked offline
      Thu Nov 18 01:36:09 2010  - WARNING: Could not shutdown block device disk/0 on node node3: Node is marked offline
      Job 139053 for instance1 has failed: Failure: command execution error:
      Disk consistency error
      
      Since this fails anyway, let's check the secondary nodes, thus
      preventing any modifications to the instance (e.g. OS type change):
      
      node1# gnt-instance reinstall -f instance1
      Waiting for job 139058 for instance1...
      Job 139058 for instance1 has failed: Failure: prerequisites not met for this operation:
      error type: wrong_state, error details:
      Instance secondary node offline, cannot reinstall: node3
      
      The patch needs modifications to the _CheckNodeOnline function, in order
      to display meaningful messages ("Can't use offline node" would be very
      confusing for an instance reinstall, since we didn't select a node
      manually).
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRené Nussbaumer <rn@google.com>
      9aacb199
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      QA: check that doubly modifying an OS state is OK · 89e8af70
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      This would have prevented the bug fixed in the previous patch :(
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRené Nussbaumer <rn@google.com>
      89e8af70
    • Iustin Pop's avatar
      Fix breakage in OS state modify · e2334900
      Iustin Pop authored
      
      I was using the feedback_fn function incorrectly (it doesn't
      automatically expand the arguments).
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRené Nussbaumer <rn@google.com>
      e2334900
  4. Nov 17, 2010
  5. Nov 16, 2010
  6. Nov 15, 2010
  7. Nov 12, 2010
Loading