After seeing how nice HUnit formats the error message on failed
'assertEqual', I think we can do better with ==?. Currently it says
(on one line): "Expected equality, but 1 /= 2".

This patch changes the code to format it similar to HUnit:

  Expected equality, but got mismatch
  expected: 1
   but got: 2

(on three lines). This makes it more clear what is the expected and
what is the wrong value.

A few tests have been modified to ensure that the expected value is
the second argument to ==?. This is different than HUnit, but makes
more sense in the operator version (I think).

Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Helga Velroyen <helgav@google.com>