From 0ef4d576dc2fc077b01d727f829ebcc616eb15c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:19:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Add test for downgrade without names
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Until now there was no test for calling βLockSet.downgradeβ without
specifying any names.
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Guido Trotter <ultrotter@google.com>
---
test/ganeti.locking_unittest.py | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/ganeti.locking_unittest.py b/test/ganeti.locking_unittest.py
index 85fa0fc66..494994cdb 100755
--- a/test/ganeti.locking_unittest.py
+++ b/test/ganeti.locking_unittest.py
@@ -1703,6 +1703,21 @@ class TestLockSet(_ThreadedTestCase):
self.ls.release()
+ def testDowngradeEverything(self):
+ self.assertEqual(self.ls.acquire(locking.ALL_SET, shared=0),
+ set(["one", "two", "three"]))
+
+ # Ensure all locks are now owned in exclusive mode
+ for name in self.ls._names():
+ self.assertTrue(self.ls.check_owned(name, shared=0))
+
+ # Downgrade everything
+ self.assertTrue(self.ls.downgrade())
+
+ # Ensure all locks are now owned in shared mode
+ for name in self.ls._names():
+ self.assertTrue(self.ls.check_owned(name, shared=1))
+
def testPriority(self):
def _Acquire(prev, next, name, priority, success_fn):
prev.wait()
--
GitLab